英语翻译——不要网上在线翻译的!要速度!(英-汉)
的有关信息介绍如下:The bill loses the original idea being to refer to the bearer must originate from self but loses to the bill to occupy condition. It is to lose absolutely and to lose relatively two kinds mark. The bill absolutness loses , the circumstance being that pointing to a bill already has gone with the wind, but makes the bearer have no way to implement holding to the person as one kind of material object form, tears up if because of burning, and spreads deriding but being ruined and so on gravely. But the bill relativity lose, be to point to a bill be one kind of possibly real existence of material object, the bearer has no abandoning bill right meaning of but losing being rushed to the circumstance that the bill occupies, if the bill losing, is stolen, and so on. In real social and economic activities, the bill loses relativity showing sometimes in large amount for the bill lose. Only can not ascertain that being a bill absolutness to the bill loses, think that this ought to be to ascertain that , just says generally, if the bearer has lost holding to the bill, absolutness loses still , finclause the rights and interests ought to deduce protection bearer like this just now more beneficial to losing for the bill relativity.
Paper refers to the loss of non-ticket holders for the loss of their intention to hold the case notes. It is divided into absolute and relative loss of the loss of two. The absolute loss of paper, paper refers to the form as a kind no longer exists, the implementation of its share holders can not be the case, as a result of burning, tearing up, as well as serious damage and destruction, such as Tu. The relative loss of paper, paper refers to as a physical reality may exist, but the rights of holders of notes not mean to give up and lose possession of the case notes, such as notes lost, stolen, robbed and so on. In the real socio-economic life, often the loss of a large number of bills to the relative performance loss for the Bills. For the absolute loss of instruments, often think that this should be identified, in other words, if the bearer has lost possession of the instrument, but it can not determine the absolute loss of bills or notes the relative loss of instruments should be presumed to be the relative loss, so that is more conducive to the protection of the rights and interests of holders.
钱不够谁给你翻译啊!!想解决就大方点